The Unity Beneath Diversity: A Theoretical Model for Understanding Global Conceptions of the Divine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31385/ledalogos.v1i2.372Keywords:
ultimate reality, comparative theology, religious pluralism, monotheism, philosophy of religionAbstract
This article explores how major world religions understand ultimate reality, engaging the enduring philosophical challenge of reconciling unity and diversity. Addressing a gap in comparative theology, which often remains largely descriptive, it proposes a theoretical model that interprets divine unity as a structural pattern rather than a strict metaphysical uniformity. Using comparative theological analysis and the phenomenology of religion, the study examines key dimensions such as transcendence and immanence, personal and impersonal conceptions, ethical attributes, and theistic and non-theistic orientations across Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. The findings show that, despite their differing metaphysical frameworks, these traditions converge in articulating an ultimate source that grounds moral order, existential meaning, and human engagement with the sacred. The article contributes a philosophically informed model of non-uniform divine unity, offering a coherent approach to understanding religious plurality while fostering interreligious dialogue and highlighting the deeper coherence underlying diverse religious experiences.
References
Armstrong, K. (1993). A history of God: The 4,000-year Quest of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. New York: Ballantine Books.
Barton, J. (2001). A Short Introduction to the Hebrew Bible. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press.
Barth, K. (1969). Church Dogmatics (Vol. I/1). Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
Caputo, J. D. (2006). The Weakness of God: A Theology of the Event. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Clooney, F. X. (2010). Comparative Theology: Deep Learning Across Religious Borders. Wiley-Blackwell.
Hick, J. (1989). An Interpretation Of Religion: Human Responses To The Transcendent. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Izutsu, T. (2002). God and Man in the Qur’an: Semantics of the Qur’anic Weltanschauung. Kuala Lumpur: Islamic Book Trust.
Jaini, P. S. (1998). The Jaina Path of Purification. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lewis, C. S. (1940). The Problem of Pain. New York: HarperCollins.
Maimonides, M. (1995). The Guide for the Perplexed (M. Friedländer, Trans.). New York: Dover Publications.
Moltmann, J. (1985). God in Creation: A New Theology of Creation and the Spirit of God. New York: Harper & Row.
Nasr, S. H. (1996). Religion and the Order of Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nasr, S. H. (2003). The Heart of Islam: Enduring Values for Humanity. New York: HarperOne.
Pope Francis. (2015). Laudato Si’: On care for our common home. Vatican City: Vatican Press. Retrieved from https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html.
Radhakrishnan, S. (1927). The Hindu View of life. London: Macmillan.
Rambachan, A. (2006). The Advaita Worldview: God, World, and Humanity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Rahman, F. (1980). Major Themes of the Qur’an. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rahner, K. (1978). Theological Investigations (Vol. 1). New York: Crossroad Publishing Company.
Smith, H. (2009). The World’s Religions: Our Great Wisdom Traditions. New York: HarperOne.
Smart, N. (1996). Dimensions of the Sacred: An Anatomy of the World’s Beliefs. University of California Press.
Tillich, P. (1951). Systematic Theology (Vol. 1). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Williams, P. (2000). Buddhism: Critical Concepts in Religious Studies. London: Routledge.
Williams, P. (2002). Mahayana Buddhism: The Doctrinal Foundations (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 LEDALOGOS: JURNAL FILSAFAT

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.








