Negara dan Sittlichkeit: Menilik Peran Moral dalam Politik Menurut Charles Taylor
Keywords:
Charles Taylor, moral, politic, community, justice, stateAbstract
This study examines Charles Taylor’s critique of liberal anthropology, particularly his engagement with John Rawls and Robert Nozick. Taylor challenges the liberal view of individuals as autonomous agents, arguing that they are shaped by moral communities. His critique highlights the limits of procedural justice and the need to recognize substantive social goods. Applying Taylor’s perspective to the Indonesia context, this study explores how communal values influence democracy, justice, and social integration. In a pluralistic society like Indonesia, Taylor’s insights offer a critical framework for understanding the balance between individual rights and collective identity. By connecting Taylor’s critique to Indonesian politics, this research contributes to debates on liberalism and communitarianism. It underscores the need for a context-sensitive approach to political philosophy, reaffirming the role of moral communities in shaping democratic ideals.
References
Appiah, K. A. (2005). The Ethics of Identity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Balzer, N. (2014). Die Politik der Anerkennung: Zum Zusammenhang von Authentizität und Anerkennung (Charles Taylor). In N. Balzer (Ed.), Spuren der Anerkennung: Studien zu einer sozial-und erziehungswissenschaftlichen Kategorie (pp. 175–237). New York: Spinger.
Fraser, N. (1997). Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1970). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Hobbes, T. (1984). Leviathan oder Stoff, Form ung Gewalt eines Kirchlichen und buergerlichen Staates. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Kymlicka, W. (2002). Contemporary political philosophy: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Locke, J. (1967). Locke: Two treatises of government. London: Cambridge University Press.
MacIntyre, A. (2013). After virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Magnis-Suseno, F. (2005). Pijar-Pijar Filsafat. Dari Gatholoco ke Filsafat Perempuan, dari Adam Müller ke Postmodernisme. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
Nozick, R. (1991). Vom richtigen, guten und glȕcklichen Leben. Mȕnchen/Wien: Carl Hanser Verlag.
Nozick, R. (2006). Anarchie, Staat und Utopia. Műnchen: Olzog Verlag.
Nussbaum, M. (1999). Sex and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ottmann, H. (2012). Geschichte des Politischen Denkens. Das 20. Jahrhundert, Bd. 4/2. Stuttgart.Weimar: Verlag J.B. Metzler.
Rawls, J. (2017). A theory of justice: Applied ethics. London: Routledge.
Sandel, M. (1998). Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. (1985a). Atomism. In Philosophy and the Human Sciences, Philosophical Papers 2 (pp. 187–210). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. (1985b). What is agency. In Human agency and language: Philosophical papers 1 (pp. 15–44). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, C. (1988). Negative Freiheit? Zur Kritik des neuzeitlichen Individualismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, C. (1992). The ethics of authenticity. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, C. (1996). Quellen des Selbst. Die Entstehung neuzeitlicher Identitӓt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.
Taylor, C. (2021). The politics of recognition. In J. Arthur (Ed.), Campus War (pp. 249–263). New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 JURNAL FILSAFAT LEDALOGOS
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
